Research Articles

A bibliometric analysis of South Africa’s scientific outputs – some trends and implications

Michael Kahn
South African Journal of Science | Vol 107, No 1/2 | a406 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i1/2.406 | © 2011 Michael Kahn | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 15 August 2010 | Published: 27 January 2011

About the author(s)

Michael Kahn, Centre for Research on Science and Technology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Abstract

The paper examines the change in volume of South African publications as indexed to the Web of Science over the periods 1990–1994 and 2004–2008. It was noted that publication volumes have increased sharply even while the stock of researchers has remained static. A number of factors may account for the rise including the increase in the Department of Education publication subsidy, the increase in the number of South African journals indexed to the Web of Science and a shift in focus to fields with higher publication propensity. For example, it was noted that a new growth area has emerged in the field of infectious diseases. The publication count by author institution showed that collaboration with foreign authors has increased considerably across the two periods and it is suggested that it is this factor that best accounts for the rise in volume. The concentration by subject area permitted some judgement to be made regarding the prospects for the five grand challenges of the Ten Year Innovation Plan. Lastly, it was noted that if it is collaboration that is driving the volume increase, the system is vulnerable to offshore changes.

Keywords

bibliometrics; publication volume; subject area; author address; innovation policy

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2040
Total article views: 2540

References


White Paper on Science and Technology. Pretoria: Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology; 1996.

Archambault E, Vignola-Gagne E, Cote G, et al. Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics. 2006;68(3):329–342. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z

De Bellis N. Bibliometrics and citation analysis. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press Inc.; 2009.

Thomson Reuters. Web of Science [homepage on the Internet]. 2010 [cited 2010 Dec 22] Available from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/web_of_science

Towards a bibliometric database for the Social Sciences and Humanities. A European Scoping Project. A report produced for DFG, ESRC, AHRC, NWO, ANR and ESF. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation; 2010.

De Bellis N. Bibliometrics and citation analysis. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press Inc., 2009; p. 161.

Albuquerque E. Immature systems of innovation: Introductory notes about a comparison between South Africa, India, Mexico and Brazil based on science and technology statistics. Discussion paper No. 221. Belo Hirozonte: CEDEPLAR/FACE/IFMG.ASGI-SA; 2003.

Pouris A. The international performance of South African academic institutions; a citation assessment. Higher Education. 2006;54(4):501–509. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9034-4

Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf). Consensus report on revitalising clinical research in South Africa. Pretoria: ASSAf, 2009; p. 125.

Resources for R&D in the Republic of South Africa 1991/92. Results of Survey Programme no 17. Pretoria: Department of National Education; 1993.

Human Sciences Research Council. South African National Survey of Research and Experimental Development 2007/08 [homepage on the Internet]. No date [cited 2010 Dec 22]. Available from: http://www.hsrc.ac.za/index.php?module=rnddoc&func=login_register&file_id=104

Mouton J, Weingart P. R&D evaluation. Workshop presented at: INORMS 2010 Conference; 2010 April 12–16; Cape Town, South Africa.

Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf). Consensus report on revitalising clinical research in South Africa. Pretoria: ASSAf, 2009; p. 147.

Kahn MJ. Report on knowledge and innovation for the World Bank-Department of Education Multi-sector Analysis project. Pretoria: World Bank; 2009.

Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf). Consensus report on revitalising clinical research in South Africa. Pretoria: ASSAf, 2009; p. 126.

Science and engineering indicators. Washington: National Science Board; 2010.

Policy and development support communiqué. Vol. 1 No. 2, April 2009. Policy and procedures for the measurement of research output of public higher education institutions. Pretoria: Department of Education; 2010.

Innovation plan: Toward the knowledge economy. Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology, 2008; p. 8.

King DA. The scientific impact of nations: What different countries get for their research spending. Nature. 2004;430:311–316. doi:10.1038/430311a, PMid:15254529

Plant variety protection statistics for the period 2003–2007. Document prepared by the Office of the Union. Geneva: Union of Plant Varieties; 2008.

National survey of research and experimental development, 2007/08. Cape Town: Centre for Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators; 2009.

South Africa’s research chairs initiative and South African research chairs and rated researchers incentive funding [homepage on the Internet]. No date [cited 2010 July 29]. Available from: www.nrf.ac.za/projects.php?pid=61.



Reader Comments

Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.

Post a comment (login required)

 

Crossref Citations

1. Bibliometric analysis for development of research strategies in agricultural technology: the case of Taiwan
Ling-Chu Lee, Yi-Yang Lee, Yi-Ching Liaw
Scientometrics  vol: 93  issue: 3  first page: 813  year: 2012  
doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0833-3